Le protocole de cholécystectomie laparoscopique à faible impact: la combinaison de la micro cœlioscopie et de la basse pression pneumopéritoine

Etude du professeur Nicola de’Angelis (aout 2018) – cholécystectomie.

Cette étude est basée sur 14 patients consécutifs nécessitant une cholécystectomie (retrait de la vésicule biliaire) en protocole Low Impact Laparoscpy. Cette étude démontre une nouvelle fois , le peu de douleurs post opératoire sans nécessité de prise d’opioïde.

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/52/the-protocol-of-low%E2%80%91impact-laparoscopic-cholecystectom-20180903-100945.pdf

 

Avantage du retrait de la vesicule biliaire en low impact laparoscopy

Incisions do not simply sum | Janvier 2017

Thane Blinman
Critics of minimally invasive methods sometimes argue that the summed lengths of all trocar sites have a morbidity similar to that for an open incision of equal length. This argument assumes correctly that pain and scarring are proportional to the total tension normal to a linear incision. But the argument also assumes that total tension sums linearly with incision length. This report demonstrates why that premise is not valid.
Voir l’article complet:

Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi- institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy. | Août 2013

Ghezzi F, Fanfani F, Malzoni M, Uccella S, Fagotti A, Cosentino F , Cromi A ,  Scambia G

To analyze the preliminary experience of three gynecologic oncology services with minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLRH) for the treatment of cervical cancer and to compare perioperative outcomes with those of conventional laparoscopic surgery (LRH).

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/23/minilaparoscopic-hysterectomy-hosp-stay-20160329-040325-pdf-20180322-030340.pdf

Minilaparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: mini- and single-scar in urology | Janvier 2012

Pini G, Rassweiler J.
To review the development of laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and minilaparoscopy (ML), with particular attention to the urological field, focusing  on nomenclature, history and outcomes
Voir l’article complet:

Minilaparoscopic versus single port randomised | Janvier 2013

Francesco Fanfani, MD*, Anna Fagotti, PhD, Maria Lucia Gagliardi, MD,Giorgia Monterossi, MD, Cristiano Rossitto, MD, Barbara Costantini, MD,Salvatore Gueli Alletti, MD, Giuseppe Vizzielli, MD, Alfredo Ercoli, MD, and Giovanni Scambia, MD

Objective:
To compare perioperative outcomes and postoperative pain of minilaparoscopic (M-LPS) and laparoendoscopic single-site total hysterectomy (LESS)

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/25/minilaparoscopy-vs-single-port-randomised-20160329-040351-pdf-20180322-030350.pdf

Minilaparoscopy, needlescopy,microlaparoscopy comprehensive review | avril 2012

Pini G , Porpiglia F, Micali S, Rassweiler J

OBJECTIVES: To review the development of miniaturized laparoscopic instruments with particular attention to the urological field and focusing on nomenclature, history and outcomes.

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/26/minilaparoscopy–needlescopy-microlaparoscopy-comprehensive-review-20160329-040305-pdf-20180322-030303.pdf

 

Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis | Août 2008

Muhammad S. Sajid, Munir A. Khan, Kausik Ray, Elizabeth Cheek and Mirza K. Baig
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, West Sussex UK

Needlescopic cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for less post-operative pain and better cosmetic results. Needlescopic cholecystectomy is associated with longer operative time and higher conversion rate.

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/27/needlescopic-versus-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-a-meta-analysisan2-20160329-040335-pdf-20180322-030343.pdf

Cosmetic outcome after needlescopic cholecystectomy

 

Office microlaparoscopic ovarian drilling | Septembre 2012

Office microlaparoscopic ovarian drilling (OMLOD) versus conventional laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/28/office-microlaparoscopic-ovarian-drillin-20160330-050340-pdf-20180322-030322.pdf

Randomizedtrialofneedlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy | juillet 2000

W. K. Cheah, J. E. Lenzi, J. B. Y. So, C. K. Kum and P. M. Y. Goh

Since the early 1990s, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has overtaken open cholecystectomy as the procedure of choice for chronic cholecystitis, offering atients a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain an dan early recovery.

Needlescopic surgery, using instruments with a diameter less than 3 mm, has been adapted to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The small-calibre instruments result in smaller scars. This paper reports a randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which
duration of operation, postoperative pain and complications were compare din patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/29/randomized-trial-of-needlescopic-vs-laparoscopic-chole-20160329-040332-pdf-20180322-030345.pdf

Can mathematic formulas help us with our patients? 24 Avril 2010

Gustavo Lopes de Carvalho • Leandro Totti Cavazzola

In his paper, the author states, based on an interesting and elegant mathematical model, that conventional incisions are subject to more tension than laparoscopic incisions, even when the total length is equal.
We have been working with needlescopic surgery for more than 10 years.

Voir l’article complet:
http://www.lowimpactlaparoscopy.eu/document/produit/21/can-mathematic-formulas-help-us-with-our-patients-20160329-040355-pdf-20180322-030342.pdf

Mathematic Low Impact Laparoscopy